Archive for March, 2010

The World Health Organization (WHO) is signaling the urgent need for countries to declare all indoor public places and workplaces 100% smoke free. The new policy recommendations for protections from second hand smoke exposure have been released in advance of World No Tobacco Day, which takes place on May 31.

In a press release by the World Health Organization (WHO), there was a quote by the WHO director – General Margaret Chan. The quote read, “The evidence is clear, there is no honorable level of exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke. Many countries have already taken action. I urge all countries that have not yet done so to select this immediate and vital step to protect the health of all by passing laws requiring all indoor workplaces and public places to be 100% smoke free.”

According to the press release (who.int), there are approximately 4000 known chemicals in tobacco smoke. More that 50 of the chemicals in cigarette smoke are known to cause cancer. Second hand smoke exposure causes heart disease, serious respiratory diseases and serious cardiovascular diseases. The diseases caused by second hand smoke can cause premature death.

Second hand smoke causes diseases, and worsens existing conditions in children. WHO estimates that about 700 million children, almost half the the worlds children, breath air polluted by tobacco smoke. Children who breath polluted tobacco smoke air at home get their health compromised in the very position they live.

Exposure to second hand smoke happens anywhere smoking is permitted. Estimates by the WHO are that about 200,000 die annually from exposure to smoke at work

The fresh policy recommendations by WHO are based on evidence from three major reports. The three reports all reached the same conclusion:

“Monograph 83 Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking” by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

“The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exporure to Tobacco Smoke” by the United States Surgeon General’s Report.

“Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminate” by the California Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant.

Disease is costly to individuals, but it is not the only cost of smoking. Smoke exposure imposes economic costs on individuals, business and he whole of society. These costs include direct and indirect medical costs. In workplaces where smoking is permitted there are productivity losses. Workplaces that permit smoking also incur higher renovation costs, higher cleaning costs, increased fire risk and higher insurance premiums.

Acting Director of the WHO Tobacco Free Initiative, Douglas Bettcher, stated “This topic should matter to everyone, because everyone benefits from smoke-free places. With this year’s theme, we hope that everyone, especially policy makers and employers, will be inspired to claim, create and enjoy spaces that are 100% free from tobacco smoke. By doing so, we keep the bodies inside those spaces smoke-free too, and greatly increase our effectiveness in preventing serious diseases and saving lives in future generations.”

According to WHO, tobacco use is the most preventable cause of death in the world. Tobacco use causes more than five million deaths every year.

Research suggests that people who starts smoking in their teens and continue to smoke for two decades will die 20 to 25 years earlier that people who never smoke. Diseases and conditions that are caused by smoking include: psoriasis, cataracts, wrinkling, hearing loss, cancer, tooth decay, emphysema, osteoporosis, heart disease, stomach ulcers, discolored fingers, cervical cancer and miscarriage, deformed sperm and Buerger’s disease.

Banning cigarette smoking in public places and the workplace is a step in protecting non-smokers from the health consequences of second-hand smoke.


Related Blogs

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

If you’re self-employed or work for a company that doesn’t provide dental insurance then withhold reading. Like doctor bills, dental bills can also be costly for those without insurance, but with an individual dental insurance plan you can cut down on your dental bills and get the dental work you need. Don’t let that toothache linger, invest in an individual dental insurance belief today!

When shopping for individual dental insurance, you will find two popular types of plans – Dental Health Maintenance Organization (DHMO) and Indemnity plans. The DHMO plan is much more affordable, but there is a disadvantage: The DHMO belief requires you to use participating dentists. The DHMO does have an advantage as well: Usually there’s no waiting periods. If you really need an affordable plan, and you can handle going to a participating dentist, then the DHMO plan may be right for you. However, if you’d rather pay a little extra for freedom to choose your own dentist, and you don’t mind the waiting period for major services, then I would recommend going with the Indemnity plan.

Before making your decision, let’s take a look at some of the advantages and disadvantages of both common types of individual dental insurance plans.

Advantages of the Indemnity plan:

• Freedom to choose your own dentist.
• Your carrier and you will each pay a percentage of the fees you incur.
• A wide variety of plans are available to choose from.

Disadvantages of the Indemnity plan:

• Waiting periods before major and basic services. The waiting period for major services can be as long as 24 months, and for basic services the waiting period can be as long as six months.
• Many Indemnity plans require a yearly deductible (anywhere from $50 and up).
• Indemnity plans usually have minimum and maximum limitations.
• Some Indemnity plans do not include orthodontics.

Advantages of the DHMO plan:

• Many DHMO plans do not have waiting periods, and if they do the waiting period is usually short.
• Most DHMO plans do not require a deductible.
• No annual limitations are set.
• No claims to file.
• Little or no copayments.
• You pay a reduced fee for services.
• Usually DHMO plans will include orthodontics. 

Disadvantage of the DHMO plan:

• You must choose participating dentists in specified states.

Don’t choose your individual dental insurance concept honest yet. Advantages and disadvantages of each type of plan is a good thing to know, but there are also things you should consider: Is the Indemnity plan right for you, or is the DHMO plan the better choice? Do you have an immediate need for major dental work such as root canals, dentures, oral surgery or etc.? If so then you may not want to resolve an Indemnity plan, because this type of conception usually requires a long waiting period before these types of services are covered. Does the DHMO plan offer a participating dentist in your site? If you have to travel too far for a participating dentist then you probably should choose the Indemnity plan. Finally, the most important factor to consider when deciding on a plan is what services each thought covers. Does the plan cover emergency, diagnostic and preventive services?

Okay, let’s summarize… you now know the advantages and disadvantages of the Indemnity and the DHMO plans, you have a basic opinion of what each type of plan is, and finally, you have a list of things to consider. That’s a lot to take in, but if you follow this guide it shouldn’t be too hard when you start shopping for individual dental insurance. 

Once you begin shopping for individual dental insurance, you will need some shopping tips, factual? I thought so. Following are a few tips to help you while you shop for individual dental insurance:

• Search the Internet using the term individual dental insurance for Web sites where you can request quotes and information from several different individual dental insurance carriers. (Place quotes around the term.)
• Do you already have a dentist you’re comfortable with? Talk to your dentist to see which carriers he accepts.
• Don’t choose the first carrier you come across. Take your time, inquire information packets from each carrier, read all the material sent to you, and then choose the individual dental insurance plan that’s right for you.
• Using the information you receive from each carrier, compare prices and benefits of each carrier.
• Read all fine print, benefits, restrictions, limitations and deductibles closely.
• Prepare a list of questions you may have for each carrier, and don’t forget to phone the carrier and ask your questions before investing in one of their plans.
• Prior to shopping for individual dental insurance, set down and figure all your monthly expenses so you can select an individual dental insurance plan within your budget.

Now you should know a petite more about buying individual dental insurance, so net ready and begin the ball rolling. Pull up your browser and shop wisely!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

Medical Marijuana

The long haul debate over medical marijuana is a heated one, with both sides launching a hefty campaign for their side. 14 states have already legalized Marijuana for medical use. This week the Obama Administration issued a statement proclaiming that federal prosecutors will no longer pursue charges against Medical Marijuana users’ or their suppliers. At this point it seems like there is little room for debate. However, the general public has very little information with which to form an educated understanding. DARE classes and old wives tales have convoluted the truth to some disturbing levels. In reality, Marijuana is a safe and effective drug that can deliver low-risk benefits to even the most terminal of patients.

First off, lets begin by debunking two of the major myths in regards to Marijuana exercise in general. For if these were myths were true, then Medical Marijuana would be little more than a sick joke. The spacious one being that it can waste you. Marijuana can not kill you. ProCon.org recently requested reports from the FDA in regards to Marijuana related deaths. The relate that they produced from the data they received lists zero known deaths in which Marijuana was the primary suspect of death. Stephen Sidney, MD, Associate Director for Clinical Research at Kaiser Permanente, wrote the following in his Sep. 20, 2003 article titled “Comparing Cannabis with Tobacco — Again,” published in the British Medical Journal:

“No acute lethal overdoses of cannabis are known, in contrast to several of its illegal (for example, cocaine) and apt (for example, alcohol, aspirin, acetaminophen) counterparts…The current knowledge base does not support the assertion that it has any notable adverse public health impact in relation to mortality.”

Joycelyn Elders, MD, former US Surgeon General, wrote the following in her Mar. 26, 2004 editorial published in the Providence Journal:
“Unlike many of the drugs we prescribe every day, marijuana has never been
proven to cause a fatal overdose.”

Another famous memoir of Marijuana use is that Marijuana is addictive. Well, this one’s a tough one, because it depends on who you ask. Ask any drug addiction treatment center, and they will tell you that even mild use causes helpless addiction that requires thousands of dollars in therapy to shake. According to the United States. Dept. of Health and Human Services DASIS Characterize Series, “Differences in Marijuana Admissions Based on Source of Referral”,
“Marijuana does not cause physical dependence. If people experience withdrawal symptoms at all, they are remarkably mild.”
The definition of addiction is hazy. By FDA standards when withdrawal symptoms interfere with the functioning of daily life or exceed a period of more than 2 weeks they mediate the substance in question addictive. According to the “National View Results on Drug Utilize from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1994, Volume II:” released by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in 1996, withdrawal symptoms were only reported in 2% of heavy Marijuana users, and peaked at about 2-3 days. The most typical symptoms reported included restlessness, loss of appetite, inability to sleep and anxiety. None of the people who reported symptoms required treatment to alleviate the withdrawal effects.

Marijuana can not extinguish you all by itself, you can not overdose, and there is no evidence of chemical or any other accomplish of long term dependency. Why is this important in regards to the medical marijuana debate? Because these are the very reasons that Doctors say Marijuana is a better prescription choice over other drugs currently used to treat a variety of conditions.

Among the Data procured from the FDA by procon.org, was the mortality statics of 17 other FDA current prescription Drugs. In a span of eight years more than 11,000 deaths were directly attributed to the use of those 17 prescription drugs. What’s so special about these 17? These 17 are prescription drugs that could be replaced with cannabis.The main attraction to using Marijuana as a Medical Option is that it does not have the risk of side effects associated with harsher, legal prescription drugs.Philip Denney, MD, stated to the Arkansas legislature in support of the Medical Use
of Marijuana:
“I have found in my study of these patients that cannabis is really a safe, effective and non-toxic alternative to many standard medications. There is no such thing as an overdose. We have seen very minimal problems with abuse or dependence, which at worst are equivalent to dependence on caffeine.”

When ruling on Docket #86-22, Francis Young (The DEA’s Administrative Law Mediate)
stated that:
“In strict medical terms marijuana is far safer than many foods we commonly consume. For example, eating 10 raw potatoes can result in a toxic response. By comparison, it is physically impossible to eat enough marijuana to induce death. Marijuana in its natural form is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. By any measure of rational analysis marijuana can be safely used within the supervised routine of medical care.”

In those states that allow it, doctors can prescribe Medical Marijuana to patients suffering from AIDS, anorexia, arthritis, asthma, cachexia, cancer, chronic pain, glaucoma, migraine, persistent muscle spasms, including spasms associated with multiple sclerosis, seizures, including seizures associated with epilepsy, severe nausea, as well as other chronic or persistent medical symptoms.

In 1999, the Institute of Medicine, in the most comprehensive study of medical marijuana’s efficacy to date, concluded, “Nausea, appetite loss, pain and anxiety . . . all can be mitigated by marijuana.”

The Aids Action Council has discussed and supported the legalization of medical Marijuana to AIDS patients. Donald Abrams, MD said in Aug of 03 in his report “Short-Term Effects of Cannabinoids in Patients with HIV-1 Infection,”
“Patients receiving cannabinoids [smoked marijuana and marijuana pills] had improved immune function compared with those receiving placebo. They also gained about 4 pounds more on average than those patients receiving placebo.”

One doctor found that 78% of 56 cancer patients with nausea who were resistant to standard drugs became symptom free through inhaling cannabis. Common Drugs used to ease the symptoms associated with chemotherapy treatments such as Marinol have little effect and often have troubling side effects. Cannabis can be used as an antiemetic, a drug which relieves nausea and allows patients to eat and live normally. It is safer, cheaper and often more effective. Marijuana also stimulates the appetite, helping patients maintain a healthy weight and the strength to recover.

It may seem unique to think that smoking anything can stop and Asthma attack, but in a study by the New England Journal Of Medicine, Donald P. Tashkin, MD found that :

“Marijuana smoke, unlike cigarette smoke, causes bronchodilatation [expansion of the air passages] rather than bronchoconstriction [narrowing of the air passages] and, unlike opiates, does not cause central respiratory depression.”

When subjects were induced into exercise related attacks, the subjects that received the placebo Marijuana took 20 min. to an hour to fully recover. The subjects that smoked a single dose of Marijuana saw instant relief.

In an age of puny gadgets. younger and younger people are being faced with the pains of arthritis and carpel tunnel syndrome, characterized by an inflammation of the joints or the lining that protects them called synovium. Cannabis modulates the productions of proteins which reduce the inflammation and ease damage.

Organizations that have endorsed medical access to marijuana include: the Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Family Physicians; American Bar Association; American Nurses Association; American Public Health Association;American Society of Addiction Medicine; AIDS Action Council; British Medical Association; California Academy of Family Physicians; California Legislative Council for Older Americans; California Medical Association; California Nurses Association; California Pharmacists Association; California Society of Addiction Medicine; California-Pacific Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church; Colorado Nurses Association; Consumer Reports Magazine; Kaiser Permanente; Lymphoma Foundation of America; Multiple Sclerosis California Action Network; National Association of Attorneys General; National Association of People with AIDS; National Nurses Society on Addictions; Fresh Mexico Nurses Association; New York State Nurses Association; New England Journal of Medicine; and Virginia Nurses Association.

With all this compelling evidence in more than 15 government studies alone, it’s hard to understand why there are still 36 that do not allow the use of Medical Marijuana. The chief (and practicably sole) argument of the opposition is the dangers related to the smoking of Marijuana. Smoking anything damages your lungs, though the level of carcinogens in a suggested dose of Marijuana is about the equivalent of a day out in the city. Ethan Russo, MD, in a letter to ProCon.org wrote:
“Smoking is a rapid and easily titrated form of cannabis delivery, but recent techniques such as vaporization, sublingual and nebulized cannabis-based medicine extracts offer other choices to the clinical cannabis patient without the risks
of smoking.”

Yet In spite of the established medical value of marijuana, doctors are presently permitted to prescribe cocaine and morphine – but not marijuana.

The American Government is no stranger to the medical Marijuana debate. In 1978 a court ruled that the Federal Government had to allow some patients to posses medical marijuana based on a “Medical Necessity”. To this day the Federal Government still provides 7 surviving members of the Investigational New Drug compassionate access program with access to marijuana for medical purposes.

The continued site 1 status of Cannabis Sativa is a downright human injustice committed by the American Government against its people. The sick, disabled and dying are being forced into a moral dilemma. Weighing quality of life and effective medical treatment against their personal freedom. Marijuana is a safe and effective drug that can deliver low-risk benefits to even the most terminal of patients. Even with the support of the scientific community, Doctors and a slew of Health care associations the Federal Government still balks. The FDA still refuses to classify Marijuana has having medical benefits. There are many political roadblocks and social barriers standing against the Legalization of Medical Marijuana. However, the truth can not be denied forever, and one day at a time those that support Marijuana as a Medical option make headway in the fight for relief.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace